| --- Tue Feb 7 2012 | 00:00 | |
| someguy | if you write a follow up paper that describes why some experimental result happens with additional new data using new characterization methods, what would you call it? for example, review papers give a broad view of the state of the art of one field | 22:56 |
|---|---|---|
| soul-d | <first paper's name> The sequel | 22:58 |
| humble_hoser | are you following up on your own paper, or someone else's? | 22:59 |
| someguy | someone else's | 23:02 |
| someguy | humble_hoser: it's not my paper | 23:08 |
| someguy | i mean the original was not my paper | 23:08 |
| Sync | A follow up on: foobar | 23:09 |
| someguy | is that common? | 23:10 |
| Sync | there are some papers like that | 23:12 |
| someguy | ok cool | 23:12 |
| --- Wed Feb 8 2012 | 00:00 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.9.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!